Hang The DJ!

•November 17, 2010 • Leave a Comment

It’s a subject I’ve touched upon briefly in the past.

Overly cheerful DJ’s are possibly the worst thing to wake up to every day. The alarm clock goes off, or you stroll into the kitchen or you get into the car … most likely still not fully awake … and you are bombarded with these arseholes who, after years of getting up at 3am in order to get to their breakfast show by 6 have turned into jibbering, brainless morons that think rambling on about last night’s X Factor whilst hopped up on vicious amounts of caffeine constitutes morning entertainment.

It is 8am! What is REALLY needed here is regular traffic reports amongst an eclectic mix of calm, soothing music. I’m not asking for whalesong or fucking Coldplay … but Nickelback and Eminem first thing in the morning can do absolutely NOTHING to help start the day well!

But nothing is more annoying than the rambling. Sweet Fucking Jesus, they just never stop. You can imagine that, even during news updates and whilst playing songs, they’re still there, pupils dilated, their 20th espresso of the morning in their shaking hand just gabbling at the mic … no one listening, not even noticing! And they are just SO PLEASED with themselves. They love themselves so much they can barely stand it. I’m not sure they have the IQ to grasp this, but when Chris Moyles proclaimed himself as The Saviour Of Radio 1, he was being ironic!

Although, that’s pretty much the only time he can be used as an example of better behaviour than the rest of the herd. His style of broadcasting is otherwise the epitome of everything that is bad in radio. The constant references to inside jokes, the likes of which you have to have been listening every day for years to understand. The introduction of “characters” to the show who are basically there to fetch tea but end up on the air because the presenter is under the illusion that they’re just HILARIOUS.

Well, they’re not. They’re just as moronic as you, but lacking the basic skill of pressing the right button when they’re required to.

Not that the presenter actually has much button-pushing to do! The producers take care of anything that requires an IQ that has reached double figures. But of course, not even the producers can keep their traps shut these days. News Flash, pal – you’re on THAT side of the glass because you have no personality. You’re good for pushing buttons, and that’s about it. DON’T try to join in with the DJ’s banter. The results are ALWAYS nothing short of embarassing.

So, onto these tossbag’s show’s contents.

When they can manage to go more than a few minutes without fucking things up by broadcasting dead air … or being so totally disorganized that they can’t find their feeble attempt at show notes … and finding their ineptitude completely hilarious of course, the actual programs always contain the same pap and fluff with the occasional offensive comment – totally scripted in order to get a response … ANY response … from the listener – and is always accompanied by the same tired playlist of 15 songs (if we’re lucky) that the station is contracted to play what seems like 100 times a day, every day!

Even stations that go on about being “no repeat radio” just shuffle the same collection of songs about every day. OK, so you don’t play the same song twice in any 12 or 24 hours … but once that time has expired we’re straight back into the exact same playlist! It wouldn’t even be quite so bad if the songs spanned a few genres, but they just don’t. You get no variety, no variation – EVERYTHING is from the exact same tiny section of the music available to us as consumers.

And to compound this endlessly annoying behaviour, these stations advertize “theme hours” and “theme weekends” in which they SEEM to be promising somthing different, but in fact are not!

Tune in this weekend! It’s 80’s weekend!

But your station plays 80’s music all week anyway! HOW IS IT DIFFERENT??

Well, our NORMAL playlist is music from the 00’s and NOW … with some additional music from the 80’s and 90’s! THIS WEEKEND is music from the 80’s and 90’s with additional music from the 00’s and NOW!

THAT’S THE SAME, YOU FUCKING WANKERS!

It’s alphabet hour!

… so, that’s your normal everyday playlist played in a slightly different order!

It’s ‘Musical Connections’ hour!

… yeah, that same playlist again, but in a slightly different order!

Even the DJ’s get so totally bored with the endless tirade of the same handful of songs over and over, day after day that they start adding their “hilarious” sound effects and idiotic comments all through the tunes. This is so disrespectful fo the artists!

Playing a clip of Tarzan’s cry over the chorus of a song because, in your unprofessional opinion, the guy singing sounds like he’s swinging through trees? Fuck you!

How do people put up with this mindless drivel?

Quizzes full of such ridiculously easy questions that any 5 year old could answer, being used solely to generate revenue on the phone lines. Thousands of people calling in at 20p per minute trying to win a prize forth £12.99 …

DJ’s making comments and stating “facts” knowing they’re wrong JUST TO CATCH the pedants listening who will find it their duty to text in and correct them … again, generating a chunk of revenue for the penny-pinching station’s coffers.

Oh, and let’s not forget the News and Weather updates that we’re forced to endure every 30 minutes … whether they have changed or not!

For a start, I feel it’s just complete overkill to have these updates on the half-hour. Seriously, if the news stories haven’t changed in the slightest in the 28 minutes since the last broadcast, is it REALLY necessary to trudge through them again? Just how many new listeners will have tuned in since the last time? And can they REALLY not wait until the hour?

And weather forecasts … for the love of God, WHY? I just don’t see the point of getting the minutia of the weather for the next few hours thumped into my skull every few minutes. It is SO RARE that any weather conditions that would actually affect me in any way – apart from turning on my car’s windscreen wipers – happen that I think it would be perfectly logical to drop weather reports completely from television and radio unless SOMETHING IS ACTUALLY HAPPENNING! 99% of all weather reports on the radio can be distilled into four words.

Sunshine and scattered showers.

Which means NOTHING anyway! What does that tell us?

Well, the sun is out but it might rain in some parts of the country.

Well, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, GENIUS. I could predict that by looking out of the fucking window every morning. It’s nothing but a huge pile of steaming shite. The weather is so COMPLETELY unimportant, yet people seem to obsess over it’s tiniest details!

Oooh, a low of -1 tonight!

So fucking what? YOU’LL BE IN BED!

Maybe what this rant boils down to is the fact that there are so many people out there listening to this horrible “entertainment” that the market for it is still constantly growing. It’s just another example of the world being filled with retards … another symptom of the decay of the society in which we are trying to live … and it makes me sick to think that our kids will grow up in an environment where the general public are so fucking dense.

Mini-Rant: Grammar 101

•November 17, 2010 • Leave a Comment

Yes, I’m going there. There are quite a few misuses of grammar that annoy me, but top of the list is “my friend and I”.

But it’s not that I get annoyed when people fail to say “… and I” when they should. My issue is with those that say “… and I” when they shouldn’t!

There’s a very simple rule that would clear this whole situation up. In any sentence where this “and I” question arises, all you need do is remove the element immediately before the “and I” and see whether the sentence still makes sense.

“My husband and I would like to invite you to a party.”

Remove the “My husband and” and you’re left with “I would like to invite you to a party.
So, “and I” is right in this case.

“Don’t forget to tune in to Jack and I’s podcast next week!”

No! Remove the “Jack and” and you’re left with “Don’t forget to tune into I’s podcast next week!”
Clearly wrong!

Without the “Jack and” the sentence would be “Don’t forget to tune into my podcast next week!”

So, adding the extra element shouldn’t change that. You just need to add the possessional “‘s” to the first part too.

“Don’t forget to tune in to Jack’s and my podcast next week!”

A little clunky, I know, but gramatically speaking, that is the rule. In reality, the following would actually be preferred:

“Don’t forget to tune in to our podcast next week!”

Basically, what I’m saying is that there is nothing wrong with saying “You and me.” People seem to have an aversion to using it because they think it’s not correct … but hearing people change it to “you and I” when it’s not appropriate is much more annoying to me than just sticking with “you and me” all the time!

Just stick to what you know! And if you don’t know, buy a book on “grammar for idiots” or something. Just TRY to stop being so agonizingly, teeth-grindingly irritating!

Adverts – Part 1

•November 4, 2010 • Leave a Comment

I think it’s pretty safe to say that no one likes adverts. That they provide a source of irritation to most of the general television-watching public. But what many people do not realize is that, even as the adverts are getting on your nerves and pissing you off on a daily basis, they are getting further and further into your subconscious.

It has been proven that adverts, even when actively ignored by the viewer still influence the viewer’s behaviour. This is why advertizing time between popular programmes goes for such a ridiculous price. Just 30 seconds of ad-time during the Super Bowl costs in the region of 2.5 million dollars.

These companies buy ad-time based upon the number of viewers for the timeslot and the demographic for the programming being shown. This is the essence of the “hard sell” technique that is the first of my many grievances against advertizing in general.

OK, lets say that I fall within the 30 to 35 year old male demographic and yes, I AM watching a show predicted for that group. I find it insulting that the advertizing companies further generalize and prejudge me based solely on the fact that I like a specific show.

Watching “House“? Well, you MUST need a new shaver! How about a car? How about car INSURANCE? Or how about using a company that doesn’t sell car insurance, but sells a service by which some knob with a computer googles your details for 12 seconds, slings the search results back at you formatted by some other knob’s code and charges you for the privilage? No? How about another company that does the same? No? How about a company that compares companies that compare car insurance quotes?

Just fuck off.

People will shout and complain about the prospect of giving personal details to websites because those details will be used for targeted advertizing, but people don’t seem to realize that ALL television advertizing is targeted already. It is never more obvious than during children’s TV and daytime television.

When you stick your 3 or 4 year old children in front of kids TV and go about your day, you’re allowing them to be subjected to a neverending stream of adverts for toys that instantly get ingrained into their impressionable brains! I really do believe that these non-stop adverts for toys and games during children’s TV should not be allowed. The kids have no concept of money, of what can be afforded and what cannot. All they are told is:

You want this! Tell your mom! And in case you forget, here’s the same ad, less than 10 minutes later! Now, tell your mom again! And KEEP telling her until she gives in!

Of course, the parents themselves are subjected to the same kind of hard selling techniques throughout their day.

You’re at home at midday? And you’re watching daytime TV? Well, you obviously need washing powder, washing up liquid, a new vacuum cleaner and all sorts of shit to make your otherwise stinking home smell just lovely! You’re watching a cookery program at one in the afternoon? Well, let’s assume you’re a jobless grunt whose only function in life is to clean the house for your family!

Is that not incredibly insulting?

And just to make it even more annoying, the volume at which the adverts are played is a good 10 decibels greater than the programmes you’re watching! So, you’re quietly enjoying Total Wipeout, and suddenly you’re being YELLED at “BUY SOME SHAMPOO!!! IT’S FULL OF SCIENCE!”

And so, you try to escape the yelling by changing the channel … but that’s no good either any more! It seems that all of the TV stations are now trying their hardest to stop you changing the channel as soon as adverts start by synchronizing their adverts with every other fucking channel on the dial!

Now, I know I’m not being unreasonable here. I’m not suggesting that TV should be ad-free. But we should not be subjected to this contrant stream of assumptions and insults from every ad being made! I don’t appreciate being treated like an imbecile in my own home, let alone half way through Dexter!

More Mobile Phone Misery

•October 22, 2010 • 1 Comment

Having ranted tirelessly on the subject of the annoyance of mobile phones in my life, I came to realize that my first post had merely scratched the surface of the insufferable and detremental effect this device has on me on a daily basis. So, the need to vent once more rises to fever pitch …

Not only do people make ridiculous amounts of noise with their mobile phones in normal public places, but they also cause huge amounts of annoyance by using their phones during events in which you are specifically requested to switch them off. Movie theatres is the classic example of this. The management go out of their way to request that all phones are switched off, specifically to respect the people with which you will be sharing the theatre. Yet, still we are surrounded by those that either think the rules do not apply to them, or simply don’t give a shit about ruining the experience of the other patrons.

I don’t think anyone would argue that people actually answering their phones and holding conversations during the movie is acceptible … but people do! It’s this level of inconsiderate behaviour that, in my mind, warrants punishment along the lines of public beatings. These arseholes have absolutely no respect for anyone else. They’re lost in their own tiny little world where nobody matters but them. They don’t deserve even basic human rights.

Then you have the people that fully accept the rule about phone calls but seem to think that the use of every other function on their phone is perfectly reasonable in the movie theatre! In a darkened room, where people behind them are attempting to enjoy the movie, they sit with their phones illuminating their face as they text, tweet and fuck about with anything they can.

If you don’t want to watch the fucking film, GET OUT OF THE THEATRE.

It’s so gawling that it doesn’t even occur to them that they are ruining the film for the people around them. They simply don’t give a shit. Again, the only answer is public humiliation.

The same goes for the use of phones at any other event at which people are attempting to enjoy the show. Comedy shows, concerts, theatres, anything.

Sit down, shut up and enjoy the show or GET THE FUCK OUT.

Another use of mobile phones that is not just inappropriate but dangerous AND illegal is while driving. People are fully aware of the danger of talking on the phone whilst driving, but they still seem to do so whenever they feel like it. Must be another rule that just doesn’t apply to them, right?

Frankly, I couldn’t care less if you die in a ten-car pile up caused by your lack of attention to the road. But if I’m in the car as well, it becomes my business. I will not stand for this unnecessary risk.

And this, again is only the tip of the iceberg … I know people that attempt to compose text messages, emails, facebook updates and tweets while driving. Well, I say “know”. They don’t do it while I’m in the car any more. Not if they want their phone to remain in one piece. I used to threaten to remove the battery … but as so many people have an iPhone these days, I just threaten to throw the fucking thing out of the window. They get the message.

On the subject of receiving messages, exactly when will people get to the point where they realize that receiving notifications every 30 seconds all day, every day is just TOO FUCKING MUCH TO HANDLE?

Seriously, between text messages, emails, facebook, twitter, instant messages, application messages and Christ knows what else, some people’s handsets are beeping and flashing none stop from dawn to dusk. Literally every few seconds. Being with these people is enough to drive a person insane … because they HAVE to check every message! You never know! It might be important!

In my opinion, the number of notifications a person receives is inversely proportional to the amount of actual social skill they posess. The social retards that have notifications streaming in every second of every day need serious help. Preferably from someone with a shotgun.

Moving slightly away from the social retards, email notifications on mobile phones are something that always piss me off. People simply do not communicate via email anymore. The service is only needed for confirmation of online orders and the exchange of documents. Email notifications on your phone are completely unnecessary. All you’re doing is providing spammers with a way of annoying you several times throughout the day rather than just once when you check your mail in the evening!

Texts, emails and tweets aside, the mobile phone is still the most obnoxious, rude device ever created. Receiving a phone call is exactly like someone standing in front of you, shouting “TALK TO ME! TALK TO ME!” and prodding you in the chest every two seconds until you speak to them. But it’s so difficult to get this point across. You tell someone that you didn’t get their text, didn’t receive their call and didn’t hear their voicemail because your phone was off – because you simply didn’t want to be disturbed and they look at you like you’ve strolled into their house and shit on their kitchen table!

We cannot allow privacy and the ability to be left alone to become a thing of the past!

You may think that the fact that you have my number in your phone gives you the right to invade my life at any time. You may have cultivated the elevated sense of self importance that phones give some mentally challenged people, but I refuse to be bullied into being at your beck and call 24 hours a day, every day. If you’re so desperate for attention, get yourself a gerbil, or a dog, or a prostitute! I don’t care! Just get out of my damn face.

Next up, the cheap bastards that use prepaid sim cards and attempt to make their own money last for as long as they can by forcing other people spend theirs! Cheeky fuckers that “one-tone” you when they want to speak to you – ring your phone for a couple of seconds and hang up, making YOU call THEM back. Who do they think they are? Why should I be paying for the call YOU want to make? Go Fuck Yourself!

These same people whinge and complain if you don’t send a response to their every text – even if it’s just an “OK” … and yet they’re the worst offenders for not responding!

Yeah, I got your message, but wanted to save my credit!

Get a real contract! What are you, 12?

Even now, there are aspects of mobile phone use that I’ve not covered … it’s an incredibly invasive device that has turned just about everyone I know into a dribbing, irritating idiot. Here’s hoping that sooner rather than later, this obsession that has been fed by the onslaught of apps and social networking sites will diminish and we will be able to live like civilized human beings again.

Although somehow, I can’t see it.

Mobile Phone Ignorance

•October 21, 2010 • Leave a Comment

Many years from now, when the wise men of the future look back at the downfall of the human race in the 20th and 21st Centuries, I have no doubt at all that they will cite the mobile phone as the beginning of the end.

This device has a hell of a lot to answer for. From it’s social implications to the tiny annoyances that become so frequent and widespread that they end up driving you up the wall with anger … to the completely anti-social, purposely irritating and offensive uses to which certain unbearable elements of the human race put them.

Let’s begin with something universally annoying.

Why is it that so many people insist on having their ringtones set to maximum volume? Fair enough, in a lot of noisy situations, it’s perfectly reasonable to have your phone turned up loud enough to hear. But for example, the quiet zone on a train – does that situation warrant a ringtone volume that would cut through the sound of a hundred hyenas giving birth?

It’s the complete lack of consideration for others that really gets to me in this particular example. There’s no way that these people simply forget that their phone isn’t in silent mode – because they’re exactly the same people that you can see prodding at the damn things every few seconds in case there is a new text message or Facebook Status Update that they’ve somehow missed since the last prod.

Do they think we want to hear their crappy little ringtone?
Are they trying to boast about their taste of music?
And do they really believe that BLARING out Akon’s latest for 20 seconds every time they get a call is the way to do it?

We don’t care! Put it on vibrate, you unbelievable arsehole!

Plus, once these tossers have let their shitty ringtone play for what seems like an eternity, we then have to endure their half of the conversation as they proceed to yell into the phone like it’s a baked bean tin connected by a length of string to the other party, a good 20 miles away.

Here’s a tip for you.

If you have to speak at a level that is even slightly above normal conversational volume just to be heard, chances are there’s something wrong with your phone.

“Wot? Summink wrong wiv ma wikid, perfect i-fone?”I hear you cry with that same slurred, broken English and with the same strangely simultaneously bored and annoyingly overenthustastic tone in which you carry out your lengthy conversations about absolutely nothing.

Yes. Stop yelling and get it fixed, you retard.

This brings me nicely onto something that I like to call “Chav FM”: The free music broadcast service available on the top deck of every bus in Great Britain!

Whenever I use public transport, it always astounds me that I’ve never seen a news story about one of those chavvy little teenage fuckwads that frequent the upper deck of buses being force-fed his own mobile phone by someone that has just finally snapped after putting up with the onslaught of the shit music they insist on pumping out of their tinny handsets for the entirity of the journey. It wouldn’t be quite as annoying if they occasionally played something worthwhile. Something that could actually be classed as music. But it’s always the worst kind of R&B and Rap music that they can possibly find.

Not that their taste in music is the real issue here. Again, it’s the total mind-numbing self-important lack of consideration for the people around them that sparks my fury.

There are times when what I feel like more than anything at seven o’clock in the morning is a good twenty minute blast of loud, obnoxious metal. But, not being a fucking wanker, I don’t inflict it everyone around me! I am fully aware of the social construct of our society and I like to live within it – in the hope that others will pay me the same courtesy.

Obviously, I’m constantly disappointed.

These Chav FM DJ’s are a huge offender in my mind and need stringing up by their genitals until they see the error of their ways.

But I digress …

Now, I’ve banged on about Facebook in the past, so I’ll keep this short.

One of the mobile phone’s biggest crimes against humanity is affording it’s user the opportunity to constantly “check” and “update” the plethora of so-called Social Networking sites.

The irony, of course, being that the very act of ignoring your ACTUAL friends even when they are sitting right next to you in order to send an inane message to one of your fake friends on the internet is INCREDIBLY rude and ANTI-social.

The use of Facebook is a perfect example of how the mobile phone is turning entire generations into ignorant, rude and self-important idiots.

Now, I never count myself completely out of my sweeping generalizations! I don’t mind admitting that I read Twitter updates for probably 30 to 40 minutes every day. But I consider Twitter to be in a different league of “Social” site than anything else. There’s no pretense of following famous people to be their “friend“. If you’re following someone, it’s because you are actually interested in what they have to say.

A very accurate comment appeared in my feed just a couple of days ago.

Twitter makes me like people I’ve never met while Facebook makes me hate people I know in real life.

So incredibly true. Although, it’s not just the content of the updates that makes me hate them. It’s the frequency in which they prod the updates into their phones while I’m trying to have a converasation with them. Just makes me want to punch them right in the fucking mouth.

This ties in with a kind of mobile phone ignorance that I’ve disliked for as long as I can remember. Way before social networking was the craze, in the very same way that Facebook kills conversations now, the text message became one of the most offensive things in my life.

In my mind, if I am face-to-face with a friend and we are mid-conversation and my phone alerts me of a text message … the person in my presence takes precedence! It seems so amazingly obvious to me that it’s just unbelievably rude to hold your hand up to someone with whom you are actually talking, stop the converastion practically mid-fucking-sentence so you can read a text message!

You ignorant, arrogant twat!

In these situations, I simply break off the conversation and walk away. Obviously, the person is not actually interested in what I’m saying – so why bother?

And finally, bringing it back to something on which we can hopefully all agree … text message abbreviations.

It has become the “in thing” to spell as much of your messages incorrectly as possible and this offends me on several levels.

Obviously, as a user of the English language, I make an effort to use it in the way it was meant. Maybe my grammar isn’t perfect on occasion, but I certainly try to speak and write properly when it matters. So, to see this trend of purposeful misspelling and unnecessary abbreviation growing around me makes my blood boil!

It’s not interesting, nor is it clever to act thick.

On the other hand, we have the people that simply ARE thick. It always makes me cringe when I see misspelled words on signs outside shops or in pubs … and even on television, usually in adverts for upcoming programmes on the badly run satellite and cable channels. This general dropping of the general public’s average IQ can certainly be linked to the lack of proper spelling and grammar in text messages and emails alike.

People tend to see the dislike of incorrect spelling and grammar as a “pet hate“. Something on which only total pedants waste their time. Well, I disagree. Reading a message laced with spelling errors is like listening to a song being sung out of key. It’s something that a lot of people simply cannot ignore. It’s lazy, unnecessary and just plain annoying.

Third, it’s abbreviations. You can ask people why they opt for “c u l8r” and they’ll tell you that it’s simply quicker and easier to type that than “see you later”.

Um, BULLSHIT.

Predictive text wes designed to make composing messages quicker and easier than selecting every letter separately in that manner. In fact, on many handsets you have to turn the predictive text function off to use these “handy” abbreviations! Can you begin to even imagine the amount of money that has been spent over the last fifteen years in creating this functionality … only to see it ignored? It doesn’t bare thinking about!

You might argue that predictive text doesn’t work. Well, the problem is that it assumes that you know how to spell. As I’ve already established, if you’re one of those people that has difficulties, it’s probably because you’re a bit thick.

Furthermore, on a lot of more recent handsets, they keyboards are qwerty! The very same layout that you use every day on your computer. So, it should be absolutely no problem to type a short message properly without having to resort to childish abbreviations for as many of the words as you can. Are you so fucking lazy that you’re making the effort to save yourself 3 or 4 key presses per message?

Get over yourself, you irritating cunt.

Mini Rant: Isn’t It Ironic.

•October 20, 2010 • Leave a Comment

Whilst browsing on twitter today, I found myself searching for any tweets concerning Alanis Morissette and I was really taken aback to see that, 15 years on, people are still making idiotic comments about the lyrics of her song, “Ironic“.

Since the tune’s release, people have been whinging on about how the examples of irony in the lyrics are not ironic … and that that fact in itself IS ironic.

Well, far be it from me to rant … *ahem* but THEY ARE IDIOTS.

Not only are they idiots because they’re ignorant of the definition of irony, but they’re idiots because they go online to make comments they believe to be clever without even checking that they know what they’re talking about!

OK, this is a bit of a petty complaint on my part … but this criticism of the song’s lyrics is so often repeated that I think it deserves some defence!

Irony can be defined in a few different ways. Dictionary definitions will talk about the use of irony in sarcastic speech – making a comment with one meaning whilst actually conveying the opposite – but to define it in context of the song, we need to look at two specific definitions.

First, we have the definition with which the IDIOTS are familiar:

Ironic – An event whose outcome is opposite to that which was expected such that the incongruity is made obvious.

So for example, “10,000 spoons, when all you need is a knife.”

If you needed a knife and couldn’t find one – that’s irritating.
But if you need a knife and are bombarded to the point of ridicule with spoons … then, the situation is ironic.

The same logic can be applied to other lines within the song …

eg.
“… a black fly in your chardonnay.” (Black fly in your white wine.)
“… a No Smoking sign on your cigarette break.”
But these are not the song’s lyrics about which the IDIOTS are complaining, so let’s take a different line:

“An old man turned 98. He won the lottery and died the next day.”

Ironic?

Well, by the definition above, no.

But, unless your IQ is struggling to get out of single figures, it should occur to you that the word can have more than one meaning:

Irony – An outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.

Yes, the second definition is similar to the first, but with a major difference. For a situation to be ironic, it is NOT ALWAYS necessary for the event to be drawing attention to the incongruity of the situation. An event can be ironic simply by occuring in a manner that is contrary to the expected outcome.

So, dying the day after winning the lottery?
Irony.

Rain on your wedding day?
Irony!

A Death Row pardon two minutes too late?
IRONY!

So, for the love of God, would you just let it rest?

You want to know something that’s really ironic? The fact that you’re whinging about something NOT being ironic when it actually IS!

I swear, I find it unbelievable that some people are able to even tie their own shoelaces every morning.

The Office Retard

•September 27, 2010 • 1 Comment

Every office has one. You know who I’m talking about. And if you don’t, chances are it’s you.

It became clear to me very early on in my life that there are way more imbeciles in this world that there are intelligent people and the best way I could come to terms with this was to think that I could easily avoid the proles with minimum effort.

This has been true for the most part. My family’s gene pool is sufficiently chlorine-free, so there are no real risk of having to interact with morons there. My social life consists of a few people I’ve known since school and university, plus a larger group of friends made through work. So again, not a huge element of idiocy there and people can be easily vetted and removed if necessary should it be discovered that anyone has been feigning intelligence and is in fact, a fuckwit.

But. The one place over which I have no control is my workplace. Every office in which I have worked has been filled to the brim with a pretty high standard of intelligent people. Maybe it’s the industry in which I work, but there are generally very few people that would even appear on my Moron Radar.

That being said, there is ALWAYS one complete freak of nature that seems to be coasting his way through office life, doing next to no work, making IDIOTIC comments all day, every day and generally making everyone around him wonder just how he managed to get the job in the first place. Is there some law, tied in with all of the anti-discriminatory laws that forces every company to hire at least one fucktard? Hell, if there is, it’s probably not even just one! It’ll be a PERCENTAGE.

Well, as you don’t meet the standard requirement that 2% of your workforce must be clinically retarded, you simply MUST be discriminating against them!

And it’s completely impossible to sack these people. With the amount of red tape, paperwork and political correctness that now envelops our working environment, an attempt to fire someone for being a total asstard is always met with the same list of ridiculous requirements:

  • Have they failed to meet their mutually agreed quarterly goals?
  • Have they been told about this and asked politely to try to improve on two separate occasions?
  • Have they been offered special training for the areas in which they are lacking?
  • Have they attended said training courses for a minimum of 6 months and showed no progress?

It’s a shocking state of affairs when you can’t simply fire someone for being incompetant. You’re looking at a minimum of 9 months before you can even START the procedure to fire one of these tossbags.

I really don’t know exactly how they get the jobs in the first place, but there is always the possibility that the person doing the hiring needs a way to make himself look good. I’ve found that, especially in very large companies, actually GETTING SHIT DONE is very much a low priority in the minds of certain members of the management. Their number one priority is being viewed as an absolute guru of their field by their superiors.

I have seen projects crumble under the strain of what can only be described as idiotic managerial decisions. It often seems that the ONLY way in which failure can be achieved on such a huge scale is by conscious manipulation from a high level … because while Success is good for everyone, Failure can be VERY good for certain individuals.

I have seen people in managerial positions force bad decisions through based on the work of the office retard. The very retard that they employed. And of course, when the failure becomes imminent, it’s that same manager that reports the failure first, with the uncanny ability to predict what will fail next so that the project can be pulled before any more embarassment … saving The Company MILLIONS!

And there lies the Holy Grail of the Management Guru.
If you save your company an arseload of cash, you’re made for life.

Is this the reason behind the blatantly terrible decision to employ at least one utterly useless waste of skin in every office?

We’ll probably never know. All we know is that we will have to continue to work opposite a drooling, mush-brained, monotone halfwit, safe in the knowledge that no matter how many times he fucks up, no matter how many projects he kills, his job is safer than that of every other employee in the building.

Facebook Arseholes

•September 22, 2010 • Leave a Comment

As far as I can tell, Facebook has four types of user. None of which is worthy of anything but contempt.

First off, you have the self-indulgent egomaniacs that think every thought that enters their head is worthy of broadcasting to as large a group of people as possible. Quite simply, these people are in need of a serious reality check. As I’ve touched upon before, it would be a huge improvement if they would just think for a second whether their comments are actually interesting. It’s the same kind of mindless “blah” mentality that people use to justify their watching of soap opera television.

“It’s on, so I watch it” becomes “It occurred to me, so I posted it”.

Well, I’m just not interested. It’s just another manifestation of the total, enveloping neediness that these social networking sites encourage in people.

“Comment on my status! Validate me! Grade me! Make me feel I’m worth something! I’m sad and lonely! Make me feel important!”

It’s totally pathetic. The MOST interesting these status updates get are when people make such ridiculous comments that even their friends start mocking them … and it’s even a stretch to call those “interesting”.

The second type of user is the “Self-Promoter”. Facebook is awash with celebrities of all levels and sorts shamelessly plugging themselves. Does no one have any self respect anymore? Do they not see how it looks to those with any brains at all when their only comments to their so-called “Facebook Friends” are essentially adverts for their latest CD, tour, book, TV Programme and God knows what else? It’s such a cynical use of something that was designed for a totally different purpose.

Then we have the third type of user. People that add the celebrities to their friends list in order to feel that they are something other than a source of income to these “famous” people. Their lives are so empty and devoid of any human connection that the only way they can feel closeness to anyone is through electronically stalking people they’ve never met and leaving inane comments on their fan pages.

If the psychiatric profession ever becomes short of patients, they should scour Facebook for people with dozens and dozens of famous “Friends” because chances are, those users are on the verge of suicide.

And finally, type 4. The type that I find most annoying of all. I’ve recently been contacted by quite a few people that seem to be using Facebook in a thinly veiled attempt to make friends with people that they know they treated badly in the past. When Facebook became popular, the people in my age group were just turning thirty and it seemed like a great way to catch up with old school friends with whom we’d lost contact over the previous ten years. Imagine my surprise when I started receiving these messages from people that made my school days a living hell.

“Hey! How’s it going! Not seen you for years!”

… from people that treated everyone not in their immediate circle of school friends like shit for the entirity of their time in secondary school.

Well, I don’t care how guilty you might feel about the way you treated me or anyone else during our school years. I don’t care whether you’re absolutely mortified when you look back and see yourself as the total cunt that you were. You will just have to live with that. Don’t look to me for forgiveness. I just hope you realize the extent to which you damaged people’s childhood and education with your general fuck-headed behaviour and outright bullying … because, believe me, however bad you REMEMBER being, for the people on the receiving end it was a hundred times worse.

If there were a hell, I’d say I hope you rot in it – but, as there’s not, I’ll just hope you find yourself under the wheels of a very large truck sometime soon.

Evolution

•September 17, 2010 • Leave a Comment

I am pleased to say that, for the most part, the people I call my friends are fairly sane. Most of them have a decent level of intelligence, whether that’s gained from years of education or just having some good old fashioned common sense. However, I am always left in a state of incredulity when someone I know – and regard with some level of intelligence – starts spouting anti-evolution nonsense.

OK, maybe you’re picking up a hint of bias here. Yes, I am a believer the findings of scientists like Darwin and Dawkins. I find the whole subject incredibly interesting and follow it with enthusiasm as the theory itself evolves. So, when I hear the strange and often pathetically ignorant arguments against evolutionary theory, it always gets my blood boiling.

The argument always starts in the same way.

“Well, it’s only a THEORY, so you can’t claim that it’s actually true!”

At this point, it not full-on anger that I feel. It’s more of a pitying, patronizing feeling of … “Oh, the poor thing. It’s so stupid. I should try to enlighten it!”

And so, I’ll start with an attempt at explaining that the word “theory” has more than one meaning. In the same way that “bad” can be used to mean two very different things, the word “theory” does not always refer to it’s most commonly known definition.

In conversational English, “theory” means the following:

“Contemplation or speculation, a guess or conjecture. An untested idea or opinion.”

This definition is perfectly valid and is the one used in every day speech. For example, in a conspiracy theory such as “Princess Diana’s death was orchestrated by the Royal Family”. It’s a statement or an opinion which has little or no basis in fact. Of course Diana wasn’t killed by the Royal Family. But the conjecture put forward by some people is rightly defined as a “theory“.

This is NOT the definition applied to the word when used in Science. Evolutionary Theory is NOT an untested idea or opinion and it contains NO conjecture or speculation. The scientific definition goes like this:

“A body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject. Or an explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena.”

The term “Evolutionary Theory” is used as a banner or title for the KNOWN FACTS about evolution. It’s not a case of “here’s what we think – believe it if you like!“. It’s a case of “Here are the facts that we have observed, all collected together.” So, it becomes obvious to anyone with more than two active brain cells that to claim you don’t “BELIEVE” in evolution is a complete nonsense. You may as well say you don’t believe in gravity, or … I dunno, badgers! Everything that Evolutionary Theory talks about is fact. There is no guess work here!

So, to claim your disbelief in Evolution is ignorant on three counts.

First, you are passing opinion on a theory without knowing what the word “theory” means.
Second, you are dismissing a set of observed scientific facts as speculation and opinion.
However, most importantly, you are passing judgement on a collection of facts that you either have not spent the time to research or simply don’t have the capacity to understand.

I firmly believe in that if you don’t agree with Evolutionary Theory, then you haven’t understood it. It’s not there to be agreed with. At the risk of repeating myself, I’ll state once more that it is a collection of observed facts.

Of course, much of the anti-evolution is brought forward by people on the side of religion. People that firmly believe that religion and evolution are two completely irreconcilable concepts. Another point of view that I do not share, but that’s a different rant.

The reason I bring up religion at all is that there is a fundamental flaw in the main argument brought forward by many religious people when it comes to evolution, and I feel the need to explore it …

It may seem like I am casually dismissing everyone that doesn’t agree with the theory as an idiot but that’s not the case. If someone brings new information or an intelligent argument forward, I’m happy to listen and debate. As long as there is basis in fact, the argument is valid. In fact, the defining difference between Science and faith is that Science is always ready to accept new information and adapt it’s view to incorporate it. And this is where the main religious-person argument falls down.

I’m often told that my “belief” in evolution is just the same as their faith … and that my refusal to go along with their faith is a classic case of closed-mindedness. Do they not see the hypocracy in this outrageous statement?

Their faith has no factual basis.

In fact, by definition, there can be no factual basis in their faith, otherwise it would no longer BEfaith“. Faith is defined as “belief that is not based on proof“. So don’t compare my KNOWLEDGE of the FACTS of evolution to your belief in a man or an entity whose existance is only backed up by fiction!

Science is many things, but closed-minded it is NOT. Every day, new information is incorporated into scientific theories. These facts change the beliefs of the scientific community, as to ignore any new findings would be illogical and indefensible. Conversely, whenever new information is presented to the religious community, it is them that routinely insist on ignoring it. Faith is the denial of fact so that a fiction can be upheld. Surely, THIS is the closed-minded group here.

I don’t want to make this an anti-religion rant. I have no right to criticize anyone’s beliefs. That is not the point I’m making here. However, Evolution is not an optional belief system for you to choose to accept or not. Stating your disbelief in a proven fact serves no purpose but to reveal your own ignorance. The information is readily available in books and on the web. Would it really hurt you to take a proper look at it?

Mini-Rant: Tolerance

•September 16, 2010 • Leave a Comment

Why is it that so many think it’s right to use the word “Tolerant” in the context of how they feel towards people of different races living in the same country as them?

It’s a word used by the type of self-righteous liberals that force their way into shot during outdoor news reports, or make it their business to get into the audience of “Question Time” just so they can proclaim their superiority to the world because they’re just SO DAMN TOLERANT. I feel it needs to be said that, by using the word in this context, these people are betraying the very racist, bigoted views that they are attempting to hide.

Tolerance” in this sense, implies a certain judgmental, condescending attitude. To be tolerant of something is to allow it … to put up with the personal discomfort caused by it … despite your grievences against it.

It must be far from uplifting to hear these people declaring that, in their eyes, “even though you don’t belong in my country, I’ll put up with you“. True racial equality means that you stop splitting the population into groups. You clear away the cobwebs that are the antiquated, bigoted thoughts in your Dickensian brains and you see people as individuals.

There’s nothing wrong with judging individuals on their behaviour. A person’s actions are all we have at our disposal to form our opinions of them. We can then decide whether we need to tolerate the individual in our lives or not. But to do this for entire groups based upon prejudice and stereotypes is illogical and ignorant. It’s amazing that many people agree with vigour that you should not judge people based on stereotypes, but do not see that that is exactly what they are doing when claiming to be tolerant of such “groups” and “minorities” within society.

We are now members of a global population that, in all but the very shallowest of patriotic ways, transcends the idea of “my country” and “your country”. These things may have meant something when you couldn’t fly from one side of the world to the other in just 12 hours for a few hundred pounds. But now, Singapore may as well be as close to the UK as Manchester is to London.

It’s possible that I’m underestimating some people’s indefatigable ability to be truly stupid and that they really believe that “racial tolerance” is the very height of human existance. Thankfully, I don’t claim to be tolerant of anyone or anything. So I don’t mind stating that these people deserve nothing but disdain and, in a perfect world, would be exterminated to prevent their twisted views being passed onto others.